About Me

Name: Michael Davies
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Abortion Ads on T.V.

And so at last it comes to this! Under a possible new relaxing of the advertising rules in the U.K both condoms and abortion clinics may be shown on commercials. Why? In an effort to bring down the rate of teenage pregnancy. I wrote an article about a month ago on the U.K governments thoughts regarding the increase in teen pregnancy. Are they so blind that they can not see they are not fighting the root cause? How on earth will advertising condoms or abortion tackle the real issue? They are just an effort to paper over the large cracks that now increasingly loom over the culture of teenage sex. 


We encourage it, we allow it and then teach them not to worry about the consequences of it. Does that contain even a smidgen of common sense?

Is America too far behind? These days it's hard to argue that it is: There are many more calls for being proud to have an abortion - President Obama supports partial birth abortion. It's difficult to see how one can imagine that partial birth abortion should be solely the woman's right. The President doen't even support helping a baby live even if the child survives the intial abortion procedure!!!

So move on commercials on prime time t.v. that target teenagers, have as much sex as you want; don't think about commitment, don't think about consequences - and we wonder why we produce a culture with no concept of financial responsibility and no sense of how their actions affect others. Really! We don't have too far to look to figure that one out! Do we?

I remember in High School learning about the horrors of The Nazi regime in Germany. One of those horrors was the amounts of targeted abortions. Children who they suspected would be born with a disease or mental illness were aborted - which is worse...to abort these or simply abort because we don't want them?

Have we become the monster we once faught against? What happened to the morality we once championed?

Michael Davies


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.K Government missing target?

I wonder why the U.K goverment missed its target!

I read this exert in an article today:  

"Data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed there were 7.8 conceptions per 1,000 girls aged under 16 in 2006, rising to 8.3 per 1,000 girls in 2007. The actual number of pregnancies in girls aged under 16 increased from 7,826 in 2006 to 8,196 in 2007. Nearly three-quarters of these pregnancies were in 15-year-old girls. And the overall pregnancy rate among under-18s in England and Wales has risen for the first time since 2002. The under-18 conception rate increased from 40.9 per 1,000 women in 2006 to 41.9 in 2007. The Government has pledged to halve teenage pregnancy rates among girls under 18 by half by next year but is widely expected to miss that target."  

What's changed in the last few years? Well the government decided to teach oral sex as a safe alternative to full sexual intercourse, then they added teaching about gay sex, and then they claim that the reason pregnancies have increased is because of a lack of teaching on contraceptive use. I don't know about your own experience but I know that when I graduated high school every student in my class had been taught how to use a condom - surely it's impossible to claim they don't know how?

I wonder if the actual reason for the increase in teenage pregnancy is the increase in teaching about sex in all it's various forms? Could this be the case? Maybe instead of teaching about the freedom of sex we should talk about the responsibilities and consequences, of sex instead?

Michael
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

My thoughts on the latest of the Big 3 Bailout

“U.S. Could Take Stakes in Big 3” Ran the headline on today’s Wall Street Journal. The irony is not lost on me; a British citizen currently marrying an American, and seeking residency and future citizenship in the U.S. When I initially left Britain, in the fall of 2001 we had just lived through a decade of restructuring and this was continuing under the reign of Tony Blair.

The British Government used to own British Airways, British Rail, British Telecom, the entire health service and electric use in the U.K and Northern Ireland. All of the above have now either been entirely privatized, or people have been given access to choices in the private sector where before there were none. Even with our vaunted National Health Service Tony Blair had recognized the need for the citizens of Britain to have other choices if they could afford it and so choose. The reason? All of the above were failing.

Enter the “Bail Out” in the U.S.A. While Government may not entirely be running such businesses as the U.S. Banks and auto firms, they are taking a much greater role in its oversight and a much greater investment in its stocks and shares. I wonder what the American people would have said fifty years ago had one told them of the current crises. Has capitalism really failed so badly as to necessitate the need of this kind of intervention? If so, was it capitalisms fault or the fault of past Government intervention?

If one determines the latter, then isn’t it logical to assume we’re only setting our selves up for another, bigger problem and several years down the line, more big Government?

Just the other day I was talking with a colleague about how much I loved the American spirit of creativity. Traditionally, in business, if it couldn’t be done one way you would try and find another method to make it happen! Where has that spirit gone? Has America lost it amidst the constant running to Uncle Sam for help? If we’re always given to, and we’re always entitled where does the school of hard knocks teach its lessons?

I’m reminded of the metamorphosis that a caterpillar goes through to become a butterfly. Has it not been proven that if it is given too much help to break out of the cocoon it will fail miserably in its new role? No, instead let it learn to face trials and conflict without the interruption of others for only then can it become everything it is capable of.

When will America re-learn the lessons of its history? Through much hardship comes character, and through character comes perseverance, and through perseverance success. For if at first you don’t succeed, try and try again.

Michael Davies

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Social Net Working Sites

Social Networking Sites

I have a few minutes to spare and so I thought I might write something about Social Networking Sites. Recently I was introduced to 'Twitter.' I thought it sounded a little weird when I first signed up for it but my friend Tiffani Barnes insisted it was the new up and coming site and that it would help the both of us keep in touch. Being what I call a "Blue" - meaning I love connecting with people and often re-charge myself by being connected with friends - I signed up. I am also involved with Facebook. My Myspace is out of date.

For those who don't know about Twitter:: Twitter lets you leave update messages of up to 140 characters - just like a text message. You can send them online, via an instant message device or by twitters very own "tweet deck." Once I sign up others can choose to 'follow me'. If they choose to do this they will then receive an update every time I leave a message. Now that I am 'Following" Tiffani, if Tiff leaves a message, I receive it. What I really like about it is that if Tiffani travels back to Texas and puts it on Twitter I am instantly aware that she will be in Texas in the next few days and can arrange a visit from that point on!

Since signing up for Twitter I've managed to find out that several of my favourite political radio hosts are also a part of it. It seems that Barack Obama used Twitter and Facebook as a means to pass his campaign message quickly around the youth who supported him. I know for Pais we use Facebook to send out messages to all current, past, and future apprentices. It also allows us to advertise and connect with youth. One would think that it has to be a good thing! Right?

My Fiancee (Soon to be wife) Heather, just concluded a study on cell phones and their use in social interaction. Heather concluded that often those who frequently text people still felt a distinct loss of social connection. Now the study was specifically about texting, but I wonder if it were broadened to include Social Net Working sites if it would offer the same results. That those who frequently used Social Net Working as a means to connect, were in fact, disconnected.

One would think the technology simply made connection easier.

I wonder if it's to do with how social networking sites are used. I put forward that the way older people and younger people use these sites and these technologies differ. I just received a "Twitter" from someone wondering why many people didn't have biographies on their "Twitter" profile. They wanted these people to "stand" for something - an insight into the man's mind. The reason I could find so many of my favourite political radio hosts on "Twitter" is because they want to use it for political means. Not a bad idea - but definitely not the main idea behind why most young people use it!

Youth and young adults use such sites to 'chat' and 'splurge'. They blog to let out their emtions and clarify their thoughts. They "Tweet"( Yes it sounds wierd) because it's "the thing to do" or because they want everyone to know about them. They Facebook for both of these reasons. Their agenda is to simply "Let people know about them." Many others tend to have the agenda of "Getting out the word about such and such." The two definitely overlap at times but they're very different.

Since those who want to use it for political ends don't use it just to inform about themselves they pour more effort into their 'real life' relationships, whether that be family, work or friends. Perhaps the reason so many young people feel so disconnected is because their social energy is poured into 'internet connections' which therefore leaves them wanting in the face to face arena.

And such are the ponderings of Me:)

Michael
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A new Introduction

My name is Michael Davies, I'm currently a youth pastor at a Bible Church in Fort Worth and a Director of a youth ministry organization. I have a passion for politics and for understanding people and our culture. Recently my fiancee challenged me about my writing. Encouraged me might be a better word. I wish to write a book. I also wish to make a difference in this world. I wish to inform, to challenge and to equip. That's why I'm writing this blog. I have another. http://yculturetalk.blogspot.com. My Townhall.com blog might have a few more posts; if all goes according to plan, but everything I post there will be posted here.

I hope, if I keep up with this, to make a real, lasting difference. You can decide if I do.

Michael

Tags: blogs  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »